Breakthrough Patient Recruitment

: What Health News Can You Trust?

What Health News Can You Trust?

Online Media Specialist

Information is thrown at you every day. Your mind's tickertape is constantly updating with things seen online, told to you by a friend, heard on the radio, or read in what I call "olde timey print." Often, these items involve a new, breakthrough in medication or treatment. Usually posted by a friend with the best intentions, these articles sometimes make me cringe because of a noticeable pattern in delivery. I've become suspicious of any headlines that have cure, cause, or revolutionary in them. Almost every time I can look the next day and find a better explanation of what's going on.

There's a general thought among social scientists (one that has also governed journalists for the past several decades) that frustration or skepticism among the public toward new technologies or discoveries stems from a lack of knowledge and the way to fix this is to flood people with information. This is called the information deficit model of science communication. Newspaper articles are one example of filling this judgement gap. The problem is the underlying mindset that if a journalist provides the news, the public will understand the true nature of what they are reading. Basically the, "Well you know what I mean," approach. So when a writer inflates a discovery's importance or over-simplifies conclusive evidence, it's not always apparent to a reader not familiar with the subject. 

Operating under the guise of fixing the health news information deficit between the reader and the scientific health community, publishers frequently use this very deficit to their advantage. Example: a reporter will take it upon themselves to (mis)interpret complicated scientific jargon pulled from a press release into something more digestible, yet still interesting to their readers. Basically, it's if you combined the technique of writing at a 7th-grade level with spin journalism. This is how "Taking Aspirin Leads to Two Fewer Strokes per 1,000 Woman Over a Six Year Period" becomes " Aspirin Reduces Risk of Stroke in Women by 24 Percent." The deficit also impacts the communication link between the scientific researchers and writers. If a writer doesn't understand all facets of the research, he or she may not fact check in order to meet a deadline or even print the press release verbatim.

All these seemingly innocuous blurred truths have a huge impact on people's consciousness of the current state of health care and medicine. This in turn affects the clinical trial and research industry. Many pharmaceutical researchers want you to be aware of how crucial words like "possibly" and "potential" are to treatment outcomes. They want you to be not only well-informed but to also have the correct information. These are all important factors in how a treatment will be properly marketed or prescribed. But some publishers of articles count on casual readers' ignorance of these points to sell their "game changing" news.

So, how do you judge breaking health news?

  • Make sure the story cites more than one study or source. Otherwise it could be taken directly from a press release that could be biased.
  • Know the numbers behind percentages. One in 10 people does not hold the same weight as 10 in 100.
  • Follow the link (if given) to the study results; it's always best to go to the source.
  • Articles shouldn't rely on customer anecdotes. Costumer anecdotes are sometimes used in place of insufficient data.
  • Find out in which phase of research the treatment or medicine is currently. Phase III is right before FDA approval, and pre-clinical studies are still testing in animals. (Side-note: Only 5 in 5,000 drugs make it to clinical trial testing from pre-clinical studies. After that, only 1 in 5,000 of those drugs have a chance to make it to market. The whole process can take 12 to 15 years). Most things you see that say "animal testing showed positive results" will never make it to fruition.

**This article is based on On the Media's A Skeptic's Guide to Health News and Diet Fads published on Friday, July 31, 2015.

0 :

About


The Healthy(ist) blog is a platform to share, learn about, and debate topics related to public and social health, scientific research, health communications, and behavior change.
We invite and encourage anyone interested in current public health and health communication trends and issues to join MMG's contributing bloggers in adding their voice to the ongoing discussion about how we can advance health, together.

Authors

MMG Headquarters
700 King Farm Boulevard
Suite 500
Rockville, MD 20850
USA
+1-301-984-7191
+1-301-921-4405 (fax)
MMG Europe
Thremhall Park
Start Hill
Bishops Stortford
Hertfordshire CM22 7WE
UK
+44(0) 1279 874463